MLS · Regular Season - 13 14 Maggio 2026 01:30

New England Revolution

#3 · 58 pts

0 – 3

Risultato finale

Nashville SC

#1 · 74 pts

34' (ass. C. Espinoza) B. Acosta

41' W. Madrigal

74' (ass. C. Espinoza) B. Acosta

Il pronostico pre-gara di ForzaPitch assegnava a Nashville SC il 36% di probabilità di vittoria (pareggio 28%, New England Revolution 34%). Il risultato finale è stato New England Revolution 0–3 Nashville SC. Nei 1 precedenti diretti, New England Revolution ha vinto 0 volte, 0 pareggi e Nashville SC 1 vittorie.

Statistiche partita

5

Tiri totali

6

2

Tiri in porta

4

0.60

xG reale

0.39

1

Parate

2

53%

Possesso

47%

6

Corner

7

17

Contrasti

16

2

🟨 Ammonizioni

3

Cronaca

23'

A. Najar

34'

ass. C. Espinoza · B. Acosta⚽

40'

M. Corcoran

41'

W. Madrigal⚽

50'

D. Lovitz / A. Najar ↕

B. Raines

56'

↕ M. Polster / D. Fagundez

69'

74'

ass. C. Espinoza · B. Acosta⚽

75'

C. Brunet / M. Corcoran ↕

76'

A. Muyl / A. Qasem ↕

↕ G. Yow / M. Fry

78'

↕ D. Turgeman / M. Zambrano

78'

83'

D. Lovitz

↕ C. Gil / E. Klein

85'

↕ B. Raines / J. Yueill

85'

86'

W. Pacius / H. Mukhtar ↕

86'

J. Bauer / R. Baker-Whiting ↕

A. Yusuf

90'

Previsione pre-partita

34.94%

New

28.44%

X

36.62%

Nashville ←

al risultato reale (Nashville SC) avevamo assegnato 36.62% (bassa confidenza)

xG previsto vs reale

Prev.

Reale

Δ

New

1.33

0.60

-0.73

Nashville

1.37

0.39

-0.98

Il dominio xG è stato equilibrato (0.60 – 0.39). Il risultato finale non riflette il dominio nel gioco. Le stime xG del modello si sono discostate dalla realtà.

Classifica

#	Squadra	G	Pts
1	Nashville SC	33	74
2	Inter Miami	33	59
3	New England Revolution	33	58
4	Chicago Fire	33	55
5	Charlotte	33	53
6	Philadelphia Union	33	47
7	FC Cincinnati	33	46
8	Columbus Crew	33	44
9	Orlando City SC	33	43
10	New York Red Bulls	33	39
11	New York City FC	33	39
12	Toronto FC	33	39
13	Atlanta United FC	33	33
14	DC United	33	33
15	CF Montreal	33	26

Formazioni

New England Revolution 4-2-3-1

30 M. Turner G 4.90

25 P. Miller D 6.20

2 M. Fofana D 6.20

22 Ethan Kohler D 6.90

23 W. Sands D 6.30

8 M. Polster 69' M 6.60

21 B. Raines 85' M 6.20

80 A. Yusuf M 6.90

10 Carles Gil 85' M 6.20

7 G. Yow 78' M 7.20

11 D. Turgeman 78' F 5.90

Panchina

88 A. Farrell D

3 B. Ceballos D

77 D. Fagundez 21' M 6.50

33 D. Parisian G

38 Eric Klein 10' M 6.30

14 J. Yueill 10' M 6.70

17 Marcos Zambrano-Delgado 12' F 6.30

32

M. Fry 12' F 6.30

4 T. Beason D

Nashville SC 4-4-2

99 B. Schwake G 7.00

27 R. Baker-Whiting 86' D 7.20

3 M. Woledzi D 7.50

4 J. Palacios D 7.90

31 A. Najar 50' D 6.30

37 A. Qasem 76' M 6.50

16 M. Corcoran 75' M 7.20

6 B. Acosta 2 ⚽ M 9.20

7 C. Espinoza 2 👟 M 7.20

41 W. Madrigal 1 ⚽ F 7.30

10 H. Mukhtar 86' F 6.20

Panchina

19 A. Muyl 14' M 6.30

12 C. Brunet 15' M 6.60

2 D. Lovitz 40' D 6.70

22 J. Bauer 9' D 6.60

23 J. Knight D

5 J. Maher D

1 J. Willis G

14 S. Mohammed M

17 Woobens Pacius 9' F 6.30

Migliori in campo

B. Acosta

M · Nashville

9.20

2 ⚽

3 tiri · 49 pass

J. Palacios

D · Nashville

7.90

· 79 pass

M. Woledzi

D · Nashville

7.50

· 60 pass

W. Madrigal

F · Nashville

7.30

1 ⚽

2 tiri · 10 pass

M. Corcoran

M · Nashville

7.20

· 38 pass

R. Baker-Whiting

D · Nashville

7.20

· 28 pass

New England Revolution — Statistiche giocatori

Squadra	Pos	Min	Voto	⚽	👟	Tiri	Pass	Acc%	Contr	GF	GR
M. Turner	G	90	4.90	—	—	—	27	22%	—	—	—
P. Miller	D	90	6.20	—	—	—	31	26%	1	—	—
M. Fofana	D	90	6.20	—	—	—	56	49%	2	—	—
Ethan Kohler	D	90	6.90	—	—	1	66	66%	2	—	—
W. Sands	D	90	6.30	—	—	—	58	50%	4	—	—
M. Polster	M	69	6.60	—	—	1	38	35%	—	—	—
B. Raines	M	85	6.20	—	—	—	55	51%	1	1	—
A. Yusuf	M	90	6.90	—	—	—	46	37%	4	1	—
Carles Gil	M	85	6.20	—	—	—	46	42%	—	—	—
G. Yow	M	78	7.20	—	—	—	27	23%	2	—	—
D. Turgeman	F	78	5.90	—	—	1	13	10%	—	—	—
D. Fagundez	M	21	6.50	—	—	—	3	3%	—	—	—
Eric Klein	M	10	6.30	—	—	—	2	2%	—	—	—
J. Yueill	M	10	6.70	—	—	1	5	3%	—	—	—
Marcos Zambrano-Delgado	F	12	6.30	—	—	1	1	—	—	—	—
M. Fry	F	12	6.30	—	—	—	6	3%	1	—	—

Nashville SC — Statistiche giocatori

Squadra	Pos	Min	Voto	⚽	👟	Tiri	Pass	Acc%	Contr	GF	GR
B. Schwake	G	90	7.00	—	—	—	36	26%	—	—	—
R. Baker-Whiting	D	86	7.20	—	—	—	28	22%	2	—	—
M. Woledzi	D	90	7.50	—	—	—	60	59%	3	—	—
J. Palacios	D	90	7.90	—	—	—	79	78%	1	—	—
A. Najar	D	50	6.30	—	—	—	21	15%	—	1	—
A. Qasem	M	76	6.50	—	—	1	15	12%	1	—	—
M. Corcoran	M	75	7.20	—	—	—	38	32%	5	1	—
B. Acosta	M	90	9.20	2	—	3	49	45%	—	—	—
C. Espinoza	M	90	7.20	—	2	—	28	24%	—	—	—
W. Madrigal	F	90	7.30	1	—	2	10	7%	1	—	—
H. Mukhtar	F	86	6.20	—	—	—	23	19%	—	—	—
A. Muyl	M	14	6.30	—	—	—	2	2%	—	—	—
C. Brunet	M	15	6.60	—	—	—	14	14%	1	—	—
D. Lovitz	D	40	6.70	—	—	—	18	13%	2	1	—
J. Bauer	D	9	6.60	—	—	—	5	4%	—	—	—
Woobens Pacius	F	9	6.30	—	—	—	2	2%	—	—	—