MLS · Regular Season - 6 05 Aprile 2026 02:30

Chicago Fire

#5 · 42 pts

1 – 0

Risultato finale

Nashville SC

#1 · 60 pts

P. Zinckernagel (ass. J. Bamba) 1'

Il pronostico pre-gara di ForzaPitch assegnava a Chicago Fire il 35% di probabilità di vittoria (pareggio 30%, Nashville SC 34%). Il risultato finale è stato Chicago Fire 1–0 Nashville SC. Nei 1 precedenti diretti, Chicago Fire ha vinto 0 volte, 0 pareggi e Nashville SC 1 vittorie.

Statistiche partita

5

Tiri totali

8

3

Tiri in porta

4

1.13

xG reale

0.70

4

Parate

2

39%

Possesso

61%

1

Corner

3

16

Contrasti

14

2

🟨 Ammonizioni

1

Cronaca

⚽P. Zinckernagel · ass. J. Bamba

1'

61'

W. Madrigal / A. Muyl ↕

61'

P. Yazbek / M. Corcoran ↕

↕ J. Elliott / C. Cupps

62'

A. Saletros

72'

D. D'Avilla

78'

78'

A. Qasem / C. Espinoza ↕

78'

R. Baker-Whiting / D. Lovitz ↕

80'

E. Tagseth

↕ M. Haile-Selassie / J. Shokalook

81'

89'

W. Pacius / E. Tagseth ↕

↕ P. Zinckernagel / V. Radojevic

90'+1

Previsione pre-partita

35.29%

Chicago ←

30.52%

X

34.19%

Nashville

al risultato reale (Chicago Fire) avevamo assegnato 35.29% (bassa confidenza)

xG previsto vs reale

Prev.

Reale

Δ

Chicago

1.44

1.13

-0.31

Nashville

1.43

0.70

-0.73

Chicago Fire ha dominato per xG (1.13 vs 0.70). Il risultato finale riflette il dominio nel gioco. Le stime xG del modello si sono discostate dalla realtà.

Classifica

#	Squadra	G	Pts
1	Nashville SC	27	60
2	New England Revolution	27	46
3	Inter Miami	27	46
4	Charlotte	27	43
5	Chicago Fire	26	42
6	Philadelphia Union	27	39
7	Orlando City SC	27	34
8	New York Red Bulls	27	33
9	New York City FC	27	33
10	FC Cincinnati	26	33
11	DC United	26	30
12	Columbus Crew	27	29
13	Toronto FC	27	29
14	Atlanta United FC	27	27
15	CF Montreal	27	24

Formazioni

Chicago Fire 4-4-2

1

G 7.20

15 A. Gutman D 7.30

4 M. Mbokazi D 7.90

3 J. Elliott 62' D 6.60

2 Leonardo Barroso D 6.70

19 J. Bamba 1 👟 M 7.90

6 A. Salétros M 6.60

42 T. D'Avilla M 6.70

11 P. Zinckernagel 1 ⚽ 89' M 8.30

7 M. Haile-Selassie 81' F 6.60

17 R. Lod F 6.90

Panchina

20 Jason Shokalook 9' F 6.20

24 J. Dean M

22 M. Pineda D

12 Puso Dithejane F

35 S. Oregel M

14 Viktor Radojević 8' D 6.70

Nashville SC 4-4-2

99 Brian Schwake G 6.60

2 D. Lovitz 78' D 6.20

3

D 7.20

4

D 6.90

31 A. Najar D 7.90

19 A. Muyl 61' M 6.20

20 E. Tagseth 89' M 6.70

16 M. Corcoran 61' M 6.90

7 C. Espinoza 78' M 5.70

9 S. Surridge F 6.00

10 H. Mukhtar F 6.90

Panchina

37 Ahmed Qasem 12' F 6.30

6 B. Acosta M

8 Patrick Yazbek 29' M 6.60

41 Warren Madrigal 29' F 6.30

17 Woobens Pacius 10' F 6.30

Migliori in campo

P. Zinckernagel

M · Chicago

8.30

1 ⚽

2 tiri · 24 pass

M. Mbokazi

D · Chicago

7.90

· 56 pass

J. Bamba

M · Chicago

7.90

1 👟

3 tiri · 28 pass

A. Najar

D · Nashville

7.90

· 82 pass

A. Gutman

D · Chicago

7.30

· 33 pass

G · Chicago

7.20

· 26 pass

Chicago Fire — Statistiche giocatori

Squadra	Pos	Min	Voto	⚽	👟	Tiri	Pass	Acc%	Contr	GF	GR
	G	90	7.20	—	—	—	26	16%	—	—	—
A. Gutman	D	90	7.30	—	—	—	33	22%	2	—	—
M. Mbokazi	D	90	7.90	—	—	—	56	51%	2	—	—
J. Elliott	D	62	6.60	—	—	—	43	39%	—	—	—
Leonardo Barroso	D	90	6.70	—	—	—	28	17%	1	—	—
J. Bamba	M	90	7.90	—	1	3	28	23%	1	—	—
A. Salétros	M	90	6.60	—	—	—	46	37%	—	1	—
T. D'Avilla	M	90	6.70	—	—	—	44	37%	1	1	—
P. Zinckernagel	M	89	8.30	1	—	2	24	21%	5	—	—
M. Haile-Selassie	F	81	6.60	—	—	—	16	14%	—	—	—
R. Lod	F	90	6.90	—	—	—	18	11%	4	—	—
Jason Shokalook	F	9	6.20	—	—	—	5	4%	—	—	—
Viktor Radojević	D	8	6.70	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Nashville SC — Statistiche giocatori

Squadra	Pos	Min	Voto	⚽	👟	Tiri	Pass	Acc%	Contr	GF	GR
Brian Schwake	G	90	6.60	—	—	—	20	13%	—	—	—
D. Lovitz	D	78	6.20	—	—	—	43	35%	—	—	—
	D	90	7.20	—	—	—	84	72%	4	—	—
	D	90	6.90	—	—	2	93	83%	—	—	—
A. Najar	D	90	7.90	—	—	—	82	71%	2	—	—
A. Muyl	M	61	6.20	—	—	—	23	18%	2	—	—
E. Tagseth	M	89	6.70	—	—	—	58	50%	2	1	—
M. Corcoran	M	61	6.90	—	—	1	39	36%	1	—	—
C. Espinoza	M	78	5.70	—	—	—	31	17%	1	—	—
S. Surridge	F	90	6.00	—	—	2	17	12%	—	—	—
H. Mukhtar	F	90	6.90	—	—	1	35	27%	—	—	—
Ahmed Qasem	F	12	6.30	—	—	—	8	7%	—	—	—
Patrick Yazbek	M	29	6.60	—	—	—	20	18%	—	—	—
Warren Madrigal	F	29	6.30	—	—	2	9	6%	2	—	—
Woobens Pacius	F	10	6.30	—	—	—	1	—	—	—	—