Brasileirão Série A
· Regular Season - 16
Mai 17, 2026 23:30
Neto Pessoa
(Vor. Bruno Pacheco)
24'
Rafael Carvalheira
(Vor. Neto Pessoa)
47'
16'
(Vor. Vitor Bueno)
Yago Pikachu
51'
Jaja
(ET)
87'
Bruno Leonardo
Die ForzaPitch-Prognose vor dem Spiel gab Remo eine Siegwahrscheinlichkeit von 40% (Unentschieden 28%, Chapecoense-sc 31%). Das Endergebnis war Chapecoense-sc 2–3 Remo.
Spielstatistiken
16
Schüsse gesamt
10
8
Schüsse aufs Tor
4
1.91
Tatsächliche xG
1.09
2
Paraden
6
52%
Ballbesitz
48%
3
Ecken
9
7
Zweikämpfe
10
2
🟨 Gelbe Karten
1
Spielverlauf
16'
Vor. Vitor Bueno ·
Yago Pikachu⚽
⚽Neto Pessoa
· Vor. Bruno Pacheco
24'
⚽Rafael Carvalheira
· Vor. Neto Pessoa
47'
51'
Jaja⚽
59'
L. Picco
/
Vitor Bueno
59'
David Braga
/
Patrick
Marcinho
/ Italo
63'
Camilo Reijers
65'
69'
Marcelinho
Eduardo Doma
/ Jean Carlos
74'
Enio
/ Mauricio Garcez
74'
76'
Matheus Alexandre
/
Yago Pikachu
Neto Pessoa
/ Rubens Ricoldi
84'
Marcos Vinicius
/ Joao Vitor
84'
85'
Gabriel Poveda
/
Alef Manga
85'
Diego Hernandez
/
Jaja
87'
(ET)
Bruno Leonardo⚽
Joao Paulo
90'+2
Vorhersage vor dem Spiel
31.51%
Chapecoense-sc
28.48%
X
40.0%
Remo ←
dem tatsächlichen Ergebnis (Remo) haben wir zugewiesen
40.0%
(niedriges Vertrauen)
Erw. vs. tatsächliche xG
Erw.
Tats.
Δ
0.95
1.91
+0.96
1.22
1.09
-0.13
Chapecoense-sc dominierte nach xG (1.91 vs 1.09).
Das Endergebnis spiegelt die Spieldominanz nicht wider.
Die xG-Schätzungen des Modells wichen von der Realität ab.
Aufstellungen
98
Anderson
G
Anderson
G
4
João Paulo
D
João Paulo
D
33
Bruno Leonardo
1 ⚽
D
Bruno Leonardo
1 ⚽
D
3
Doma
74'
D
Doma
74'
D
91
Bruno Pacheco
1 👟
M
Bruno Pacheco
1 👟
M
27
Camilo
M
Camilo
M
99
Rafael Carvalheira
1 ⚽
M
Rafael Carvalheira
1 ⚽
M
2
Marcos Vinícius
84'
M
Marcos Vinícius
84'
M
7
Marcinho
63'
F
Marcinho
63'
F
97
Ênio
74'
F
Ênio
74'
F
18
Neto Pessoa
1 ⚽
1 👟
84'
F
Neto Pessoa
1 ⚽
1 👟
84'
F
Bank
19
David Antunes
M
David Antunes
M
31
Garcez
23'
F
Garcez
23'
F
10
Giovanni Augusto
M
Giovanni Augusto
M
22
Higor Meritão
M
Higor Meritão
M
77
Italo
34'
F
Italo
34'
F
20
Jean Carlos
23'
M
Jean Carlos
23'
M
5
João Vitor
13'
M
João Vitor
13'
M
1
Rafael Santos
G
Rafael Santos
G
70
Rubens
13'
M
Rubens
13'
M
17
Vinicius Balieiro
M
Vinicius Balieiro
M
35
Vinícius Eduardo de Almeida
D
Vinícius Eduardo de Almeida
D
37
W. Clar
D
W. Clar
D
88
Marcelo Rangel
G
Marcelo Rangel
G
98
Mayk
D
Mayk
D
18
D. Tchamba
D
D. Tchamba
D
13
Marllon
D
Marllon
D
79
Marcelinho
D
Marcelinho
D
8
Patrick
59'
M
Patrick
59'
M
28
José Welison
M
José Welison
M
37
Jája Silva
1 ⚽
85'
M
Jája Silva
1 ⚽
85'
M
15
Vitor Bueno
1 👟
59'
M
Vitor Bueno
1 👟
59'
M
22
Yago Pikachu
1 ⚽
76'
M
Yago Pikachu
1 ⚽
76'
M
11
Alef Manga
85'
F
Alef Manga
85'
F
Bank
24
Braian Cufré
D
Braian Cufré
D
17
Cristian Gonzalez
D
Cristian Gonzalez
D
26
David Francisco
38'
M
David Francisco
38'
M
33
D. Hernández
12'
F
D. Hernández
12'
F
99
Gabriel Poveda
12'
F
Gabriel Poveda
12'
F
7
Giovanni Pavani
M
Giovanni Pavani
M
97
Ivan
G
Ivan
G
10
Jáderson
F
Jáderson
F
5
Léo
D
Léo
D
14
L. Picco
38'
M
L. Picco
38'
M
2
Matheus Alexandre
21'
D
Matheus Alexandre
21'
D
94
Ygor Vinhas
G
Ygor Vinhas
G
Beste Spieler
Rafael Carvalheira
M · Chapecoense-sc
7.70
1 ⚽
2 schüsse
· 39 pass
Bruno Pacheco
M · Chapecoense-sc
7.30
1 👟
2 schüsse
· 36 pass
Neto Pessoa
F · Chapecoense-sc
7.30
1 ⚽ 1 👟
4 schüsse
· 9 pass
José Welison
M · Remo
7.30
· 51 pass
Yago Pikachu
M · Remo
7.20
1 ⚽
2 schüsse
· 27 pass
Jája Silva
M · Remo
7.20
1 ⚽
2 schüsse
· 21 pass
Chapecoense-sc — Spielerstatistiken
| Mannschaft | Pos | Min | Note | ⚽ | 👟 | Schüsse | Pässe | Gen% | Tkl | GK | RK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson | G | 97 | 6.00 | — | — | — | 17 | 14% | — | — | — |
| João Paulo | D | 97 | 6.60 | — | — | — | 71 | 60% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bruno Leonardo | D | 97 | 5.90 | 1 | — | — | 62 | 59% | — | — | — |
| Doma | D | 74 | 7.00 | — | — | — | 41 | 35% | — | — | — |
| Bruno Pacheco | M | 97 | 7.30 | — | 1 | 2 | 36 | 31% | 1 | — | — |
| Camilo | M | 97 | 6.90 | — | — | 1 | 54 | 46% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Rafael Carvalheira | M | 97 | 7.70 | 1 | — | 2 | 39 | 38% | 2 | — | — |
| Marcos Vinícius | M | 84 | 6.20 | — | — | — | 28 | 23% | — | — | — |
| Marcinho | F | 63 | 6.90 | — | — | 2 | 28 | 23% | — | — | — |
| Ênio | F | 74 | 6.90 | — | — | 1 | 34 | 27% | — | — | — |
| Neto Pessoa | F | 84 | 7.30 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 8% | — | — | — |
| Garcez | F | 23 | 6.60 | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1% | 1 | — | — |
| Italo | F | 34 | 6.50 | — | — | 3 | 7 | 7% | 1 | — | — |
| Jean Carlos | M | 23 | 6.60 | — | — | — | 8 | 6% | — | — | — |
| João Vitor | M | 13 | 6.50 | — | — | — | 4 | 1% | — | — | — |
| Rubens | M | 13 | 6.50 | — | — | — | 1 | 1% | — | — | — |
Remo — Spielerstatistiken
| Mannschaft | Pos | Min | Note | ⚽ | 👟 | Schüsse | Pässe | Gen% | Tkl | GK | RK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rangel | G | 97 | 6.60 | — | — | — | 28 | 12% | — | — | — |
| Mayk | D | 97 | 6.30 | — | — | — | 47 | 34% | 2 | — | — |
| D. Tchamba | D | 97 | 6.50 | — | — | 2 | 52 | 45% | — | — | — |
| Marllon | D | 97 | 6.30 | — | — | — | 45 | 39% | — | — | — |
| Marcelinho | D | 97 | 5.60 | — | — | 3 | 36 | 26% | — | 1 | — |
| Patrick | M | 59 | 6.30 | — | — | — | 19 | 16% | — | — | — |
| José Welison | M | 97 | 7.30 | — | — | — | 51 | 43% | 5 | — | — |
| Jája Silva | M | 85 | 7.20 | 1 | — | 2 | 21 | 20% | — | — | — |
| Vitor Bueno | M | 59 | 6.70 | — | 1 | — | 38 | 33% | — | — | — |
| Yago Pikachu | M | 76 | 7.20 | 1 | — | 2 | 27 | 21% | 1 | — | — |
| Alef Manga | F | 85 | 6.20 | — | — | — | 11 | 8% | — | — | — |
| David Francisco | M | 38 | 6.60 | — | — | — | 7 | 5% | — | — | — |
| D. Hernández | F | 12 | 6.70 | — | — | — | 2 | 2% | — | — | — |
| Gabriel Poveda | F | 12 | 6.50 | — | — | — | 2 | 1% | — | — | — |
| L. Picco | M | 38 | 6.70 | — | — | 1 | 11 | 10% | — | — | — |
| Matheus Alexandre | D | 21 | 6.90 | — | — | — | 8 | 7% | 2 | — | — |
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Wie war das Endergebnis von Chapecoense-sc vs Remo?
Das Endergebnis war Chapecoense-sc 2–3 Remo.
Was hat das Modell für Chapecoense-sc vs Remo vorhergesagt?
Das Modell vergab 31% Wahrscheinlichkeit für einen Chapecoense-sc-Sieg, 28% Unentschieden und 40% für einen Remo-Sieg.