Ataru Esaka
(Vor. Lucas Marcos Meireles)
52'
Ataru Esaka
65'
Die ForzaPitch-Prognose vor dem Spiel gab Fagiano Okayama eine Siegwahrscheinlichkeit von 36% (Unentschieden 36%, Mito Hollyhock 27%). Das Endergebnis war Fagiano Okayama 2–0 Mito Hollyhock.
Spielstatistiken
13
Schüsse gesamt
7
5
Schüsse aufs Tor
3
1.11
Tatsächliche xG
0.31
3
Paraden
4
42%
Ballbesitz
58%
4
Ecken
2
14
Zweikämpfe
16
1
🟨 Gelbe Karten
0
Spielverlauf
⚽Ataru Esaka
· Vor. Lucas Marcos Meireles
52'
57'
Keisuke Tada
/
Ryo Nemoto
57'
Hayata Yamamoto
/
Jin Okumura
Haruka Motoyama
59'
⚽Ataru Esaka
65'
Ataru Esaka
/ Kamiya Yuta
66'
Masaya Matsumoto
/ Kosuke Shirai
66'
68'
Patryck Ferreira
/
Chihiro Kato
68'
Motoki Nishihara
/
Kaito Taniguchi
Na Sang-Ho
/ Yota Fujii
78'
Towa Yamane
/ Soichiro Mori
78'
82'
Rei Ieizumi
/
Yu Funabashi
Lucas Marcos Meireles
/ Kota Kawano
90'
Vorhersage vor dem Spiel
36.22%
Fagiano ←
36.69%
X
27.09%
Mito
dem tatsächlichen Ergebnis (Fagiano Okayama) haben wir zugewiesen
36.22%
(niedriges Vertrauen)
Erw. vs. tatsächliche xG
Erw.
Tats.
Δ
0.70
1.11
+0.42
0.55
0.31
-0.24
Fagiano Okayama dominierte nach xG (1.11 vs 0.31).
Das Endergebnis spiegelt die Spieldominanz wider.
Die xG-Schätzungen des Modells waren genau.
Aufstellungen
1
L. Moser
G
L. Moser
G
43
Y. Suzuki
D
Y. Suzuki
D
48
Y. Tatsuta
D
Y. Tatsuta
D
26
H. Motoyama
D
H. Motoyama
D
88
T. Yamane
78'
M
T. Yamane
78'
M
80
Oberdan
M
Oberdan
M
41
E. Miyamoto
M
E. Miyamoto
M
28
M. Matsumoto
66'
M
M. Matsumoto
66'
M
8
A. Esaka
2 ⚽
66'
M
A. Esaka
2 ⚽
66'
M
10
Na Sang-Ho
78'
M
Na Sang-Ho
78'
M
99
Lucão
1 👟
89'
F
Lucão
1 👟
89'
F
Bank
20
K. Kawano
1'
F
K. Kawano
1'
F
51
K. Shirai
24'
D
K. Shirai
24'
D
9
Léo Gaúcho
F
Léo Gaúcho
F
19
R. Sato
F
R. Sato
F
7
R. Takeuchi
M
R. Takeuchi
M
44
S. Mori
12'
D
S. Mori
12'
D
52
T. Hamada
G
T. Hamada
G
55
Y. Fujii
12'
D
Y. Fujii
12'
D
33
Y. Kamiya
24'
M
Y. Kamiya
24'
M
27
J. Słowik
G
J. Słowik
G
16
Y. Tamura
D
Y. Tamura
D
17
K. Itakura
D
K. Itakura
D
15
Y. Kimoto
D
Y. Kimoto
D
25
T. Mase
D
T. Mase
D
22
K. Taniguchi
68'
M
K. Taniguchi
68'
M
20
Y. Funabashi
82'
M
Y. Funabashi
82'
M
38
Leonardo Hugo
M
Leonardo Hugo
M
30
J. Okumura
57'
M
J. Okumura
57'
M
8
C. Kato
68'
F
C. Kato
68'
F
9
R. Nemoto
57'
F
R. Nemoto
57'
F
Bank
39
H. Yamamoto
33'
M
H. Yamamoto
33'
M
34
K. Nishikawa
G
K. Nishikawa
G
3
K. Osaki
M
K. Osaki
M
29
K. Tada
33'
F
K. Tada
33'
F
24
K. Yamazaki
M
K. Yamazaki
M
2
M. Fofana
D
M. Fofana
D
44
M. Nishihara
22'
M
M. Nishihara
22'
M
33
Patryck Ferreira
22'
F
Patryck Ferreira
22'
F
50
R. Ieizumi
8'
D
R. Ieizumi
8'
D
Beste Spieler
A. Esaka
M · Fagiano
9.07
2 ⚽
3 schüsse
· 43 pass
Y. Tatsuta
D · Fagiano
7.58
1 schüsse
· 40 pass
Y. Suzuki
D · Fagiano
7.24
· 34 pass
Y. Kamiya
M · Fagiano
7.14
· 5 pass
L. Moser
G · Fagiano
7.12
· 18 pass
Lucão
F · Fagiano
6.98
1 👟
4 schüsse
· 21 pass
Fagiano Okayama — Spielerstatistiken
| Mannschaft | Pos | Min | Note | ⚽ | 👟 | Schüsse | Pässe | Gen% | Tkl | GK | RK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Moser | G | 90 | 7.12 | — | — | 0 | 18 | 11% | 0 | — | — |
| Y. Suzuki | D | 90 | 7.24 | — | — | 0 | 34 | 28% | 2 | — | — |
| Y. Tatsuta | D | 90 | 7.58 | — | — | 1 | 40 | 34% | 2 | — | — |
| H. Motoyama | D | 90 | 6.47 | — | — | 0 | 39 | 26% | 2 | 1 | — |
| T. Yamane | M | 78 | 6.39 | — | — | 0 | 27 | 15% | 1 | — | — |
| Oberdan | M | 90 | 6.64 | — | — | 1 | 39 | 37% | 0 | — | — |
| E. Miyamoto | M | 90 | 6.65 | — | — | 2 | 41 | 31% | 1 | — | — |
| M. Matsumoto | M | 66 | 6.44 | — | — | 0 | 19 | 10% | 4 | — | — |
| A. Esaka | M | 66 | 9.07 | 2 | — | 3 | 43 | 35% | 0 | — | — |
| Na Sang-Ho | M | 78 | 6.50 | — | — | 2 | 20 | 13% | 1 | — | — |
| Lucão | F | 89 | 6.98 | — | 1 | 4 | 21 | 15% | 1 | — | — |
| K. Kawano | F | 1 | 0.00 | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1% | 0 | — | — |
| K. Shirai | D | 24 | 6.86 | — | — | 0 | 7 | 4% | 0 | — | — |
| S. Mori | D | 12 | 6.97 | — | — | 0 | 1 | 0% | 0 | — | — |
| Y. Fujii | D | 12 | 6.94 | — | — | 0 | 7 | 4% | 0 | — | — |
| Y. Kamiya | M | 24 | 7.14 | — | — | 0 | 5 | 4% | 0 | — | — |
Mito Hollyhock — Spielerstatistiken
| Mannschaft | Pos | Min | Note | ⚽ | 👟 | Schüsse | Pässe | Gen% | Tkl | GK | RK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Słowik | G | 90 | 6.64 | — | — | 0 | 35 | 23% | 0 | — | — |
| Y. Tamura | D | 90 | 6.63 | — | — | 0 | 68 | 55% | 2 | — | — |
| K. Itakura | D | 90 | 6.25 | — | — | 0 | 75 | 60% | 0 | — | — |
| Y. Kimoto | D | 90 | 6.42 | — | — | 1 | 61 | 51% | 1 | — | — |
| T. Mase | D | 90 | 6.93 | — | — | 1 | 40 | 32% | 1 | — | — |
| K. Taniguchi | M | 68 | 6.14 | — | — | 2 | 21 | 17% | 5 | — | — |
| Y. Funabashi | M | 82 | 6.69 | — | — | 0 | 47 | 36% | 1 | — | — |
| Leonardo Hugo | M | 90 | 6.76 | — | — | 1 | 68 | 56% | 0 | — | — |
| J. Okumura | M | 57 | 6.35 | — | — | 0 | 22 | 19% | 1 | — | — |
| C. Kato | F | 68 | 6.03 | — | — | 0 | 35 | 27% | 1 | — | — |
| R. Nemoto | F | 57 | 6.46 | — | — | 0 | 12 | 7% | 1 | — | — |
| H. Yamamoto | M | 33 | 6.40 | — | — | 1 | 16 | 10% | 3 | — | — |
| K. Tada | F | 33 | 6.29 | — | — | 0 | 8 | 5% | 0 | — | — |
| M. Nishihara | M | 22 | 6.11 | — | — | 0 | 7 | 6% | 0 | — | — |
| Patryck Ferreira | F | 22 | 6.25 | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3% | 0 | — | — |
| R. Ieizumi | D | 8 | 6.46 | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3% | 0 | — | — |
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Wie war das Endergebnis von Fagiano Okayama vs Mito Hollyhock?
Das Endergebnis war Fagiano Okayama 2–0 Mito Hollyhock.
Was hat das Modell für Fagiano Okayama vs Mito Hollyhock vorhergesagt?
Das Modell vergab 36% Wahrscheinlichkeit für einen Fagiano Okayama-Sieg, 36% Unentschieden und 27% für einen Mito Hollyhock-Sieg.